GQFPX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GQFPX returned 13.46%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for CSUAX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GQFPX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.

Performance

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQFPX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 10.30% return.

GQFPX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 6.97%
• 1Y: 13.20%
• 3Y*: 13.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSUAX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 17.70%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	6.50%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-1.13%	5.03%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	10.30%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-5.20%	7.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GQFPX and CSUAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.70

The correlation between GQFPX and CSUAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GQFPX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 29
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 52
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQFPX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.87	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	2.66	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	3.08	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.49	9.76	-3.28

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQFPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQFPX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQFPX drawdown since its inception was -16.95%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQFPX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQFPX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.95%	-52.20%	+35.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.25%	-5.99%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.57%	-14.95%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.45%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.96%	-2.66%	-3.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-8.43%	+5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.88%	+0.21%

Volatility

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQFPX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	3.43%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.98%	7.89%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.84%	9.88%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	12.98%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.83%	14.92%	-2.09%

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQFPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQFPX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than CSUAX's 7.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.33%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	5.99%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQFPX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

GQFPX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQFPX or CSUAX?

GQFPX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to CSUAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQFPX dropped -16.95% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.