GPZ vs. TFNS
GPZ (VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF) and TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. GPZ is passively managed, while TFNS is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TFNS.
Performance
GPZ vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.37% return, which is significantly lower than TFNS's -5.36% return.
GPZ
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -19.37%
- 6M
- -16.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFNS
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPZ vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | -19.37% | 7.07% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | -5.36% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPZ and TFNS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.68 |
GPZ vs. TFNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPZ
TFNS
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
GPZ
TFNS
Real Estate
GPZ
TFNS
-
Basic Materials
GPZ
-
TFNS
-
Communication Services
GPZ
-
TFNS
-
Consumer Cyclical
GPZ
-
TFNS
-
Consumer Defensive
GPZ
-
TFNS
-
Energy
GPZ
-
TFNS
-
Healthcare
GPZ
-
TFNS
-
Industrials
GPZ
-
TFNS
Technology
GPZ
-
TFNS
Utilities
GPZ
-
TFNS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPZ vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPZ | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.31 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
GPZ vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and TFNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPZ | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -14.00% | -17.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.93% | -8.00% | -17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -3.82% | -7.92% |
Volatility
GPZ vs. TFNS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPZ | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.33% | 15.04% | +12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 15.04% | +12.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 15.04% | +12.29% |
GPZ vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPZ vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison
GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than TFNS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | 1.03% | 0.83% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | 0.52% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPZ and TFNS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.
GPZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.52% for TFNS.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 0.44% for TFNS.
Find the right allocation for GPZ and TFNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer