PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPZ vs. TFNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPZ vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.37% return, which is significantly lower than TFNS's -5.36% return.


GPZ

1D
-4.70%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-19.37%
6M
-16.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFNS

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-5.36%
6M
-2.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPZ vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
-19.37%7.07%
TFNS
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF
-5.36%10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GPZ and TFNS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.68

GPZ vs. TFNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPZ
TFNS

Financial Services

100.0%
97.1%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.9%

Technology

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

GPZ
100.0%
TFNS
97.1%

Real Estate

GPZ
2.3%
TFNS

-

Basic Materials

GPZ

-

TFNS

-

Communication Services

GPZ

-

TFNS

-

Consumer Cyclical

GPZ

-

TFNS

-

Consumer Defensive

GPZ

-

TFNS

-

Energy

GPZ

-

TFNS

-

Healthcare

GPZ

-

TFNS

-

Industrials

GPZ

-

TFNS
0.9%

Technology

GPZ

-

TFNS
1.9%

Utilities

GPZ

-

TFNS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPZ vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GPZ vs. TFNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPZTFNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.31

-0.75

Drawdowns

GPZ vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and TFNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPZTFNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-14.00%

-17.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

-8.00%

-17.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-3.82%

-7.92%

Volatility

GPZ vs. TFNS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPZTFNSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.33%

15.04%

+12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.33%

15.04%

+12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

15.04%

+12.29%

GPZ vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPZ vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison

GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than TFNS's 0.52% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPZ and TFNS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.

GPZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.52% for TFNS.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 0.44% for TFNS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPZ and TFNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer