PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPZ vs. FBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPZ vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.37% return, which is significantly lower than FBDC's -9.51% return.


GPZ

1D
-4.70%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-19.37%
6M
-16.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBDC

1D
-2.98%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
-9.51%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPZ vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPZ and FBDC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPZ vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GPZ vs. FBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPZFBDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

-0.70

+0.26

Drawdowns

GPZ vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than FBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and FBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPZFBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-20.60%

-11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

-17.24%

-8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-10.14%

-1.60%

Volatility

GPZ vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPZFBDCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.33%

18.06%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.33%

18.06%

+9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

18.06%

+9.27%

GPZ vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPZ vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FBDC's 11.52% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPZ and FBDC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 1.03% for GPZ.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 1.35% for FBDC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPZ and FBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer