PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GPTY vs. NXF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GPTY vs. NXF.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GPTY (YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - GPTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while NXF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GPTY returned 62.19% vs 43.04% for NXF.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GPTY is traded in USD, while NXF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NXF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 38.32% return, which is significantly higher than NXF.TO's 29.89% return.

GPTY

1D
1.74%
1M
20.22%
YTD
38.32%
6M
36.02%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

NXF.TO

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
29.89%
6M
28.99%
1Y
43.04%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF		38.32%17.15%
NXF.TO
CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)		29.89%9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GPTY and NXF.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.11

The correlation between GPTY and NXF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GPTY
NXF.TO

Technology

77.9%

-

Communication Services

10.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%

-

Financial Services

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GPTY
77.9%
NXF.TO

-

Communication Services

GPTY
10.4%
NXF.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

GPTY
7.6%
NXF.TO

-

Financial Services

GPTY
4.1%
NXF.TO

-

Basic Materials

GPTY

-

NXF.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

GPTY

-

NXF.TO

-

Energy

GPTY

-

NXF.TO
100.0%

Healthcare

GPTY

-

NXF.TO

-

Industrials

GPTY

-

NXF.TO

-

Real Estate

GPTY

-

NXF.TO

-

Utilities

GPTY

-

NXF.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF

CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)

Often compared with GPTY:
GPTY vs. CHPYGPTY vs. AIPIGPTY vs. MAGYGPTY vs. QQQIGPTY vs. SPYGPTY vs. XDTEGPTY vs. TDVI
Often compared with NXF.TO:
NXF.TO vs. VXM-B.TONXF.TO vs. XEG.TONXF.TO vs. CCOM.TONXF.TO vs. CBCX.TONXF.TO vs. CEQP.TONXF.TO vs. YPLT.NEONXF.TO vs. CBNK.TO

Return for Risk

GPTY vs. NXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GPTY
GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
NXF.TO
NXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GPTYNXF.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

2.25

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

2.94

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

5.29

-1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.83

15.03

-6.20

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTY and NXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GPTYNXF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.25

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.53

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.25

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.16

+1.34

Drawdowns

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum NXF.TO drawdown of -69.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and NXF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GPTYNXF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-69.34%

+42.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-8.60%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-27.46%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-27.59%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-69.34%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.52%

+5.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-18.87%

+12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

3.02%

+4.21%

Volatility

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) is 7.16%, while CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that GPTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GPTYNXF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

7.57%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.12%

15.84%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.91%

20.28%

+3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

26.69%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.86%

29.82%

-0.96%

Dividends

GPTY vs. NXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.09%, more than NXF.TO's 8.13% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF		31.09%34.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXF.TO
CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)		8.13%7.70%8.50%8.60%11.22%9.48%11.23%7.83%9.38%6.50%8.24%8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

GPTY and NXF.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NXF.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPTY and NXF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer