PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than HBIL-U.TO's 1.33% return.


GPTY

1D
-3.10%
1M
-8.33%
6M
16.85%
YTD
19.07%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBIL-U.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.31%
6M
1.06%
YTD
1.33%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPTY and HBIL-U.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPTY
GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIL-U.TO
HBIL-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPTYHBIL-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.48

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.79

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

14.49

-11.19

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTY and HBIL-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than HBIL-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and HBIL-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPTYHBIL-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-1.48%

-25.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-1.07%

-18.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.92%

-1.00%

-12.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-0.33%

-6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

0.28%

+7.49%

Volatility

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) at 1.21%. This indicates that GPTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPTYHBIL-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

1.21%

+7.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.74%

1.64%

+20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.51%

1.91%

+24.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.74%

2.12%

+27.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.74%

2.12%

+27.62%

Dividends

GPTY vs. HBIL-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.37%, more than HBIL-U.TO's 6.75% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPTY and HBIL-U.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBIL-U.TO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Hamilton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPTY and HBIL-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer