PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPTUX vs. PBAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (PBAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTUX achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than PBAIX's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTUX has outperformed PBAIX with an annualized return of 9.29%, while PBAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.18% annualized return.


GPTUX

1D
1.21%
1M
1.28%
YTD
7.41%
6M
6.50%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
9.29%

PBAIX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.17%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.19%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
6.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPTUX
GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund
7.41%7.08%20.29%14.85%-6.15%19.72%-3.42%20.50%-4.54%18.93%
PBAIX
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund Institutional Class
9.74%6.46%12.08%2.64%6.14%0.50%6.91%1.65%4.68%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GPTUX and PBAIX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.36

The correlation between GPTUX and PBAIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPTUX vs. PBAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPTUX
GPTUX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GPTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PBAIX
PBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (PBAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPTUXPBAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.41

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

10.84

-2.00

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the PBAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTUX and PBAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTUX drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum PBAIX drawdown of -39.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTUX and PBAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPTUXPBAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-39.26%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-2.99%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-6.79%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

-6.79%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.84%

-8.94%

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.52%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-4.29%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.21%

+0.98%

Volatility

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Volatility Comparison

GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (PBAIX) at 1.27%. This indicates that GPTUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPTUXPBAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

1.27%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

4.65%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

5.72%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

6.43%

+6.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

6.13%

+6.84%

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPTUX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBAIX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPTUX vs. PBAIX - Dividend Comparison

GPTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, while PBAIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPTUX
GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund
7.79%8.37%6.41%1.24%4.81%10.27%4.82%4.34%4.68%3.43%1.05%1.05%
PBAIX
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund Institutional Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.84%3.52%0.00%2.71%3.39%10.17%0.86%1.74%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPTUX and PBAIX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPTUX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to PBAIX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTUX dropped -22.84% vs PBAIX's -39.26%.

PBAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPTUX and PBAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer