GPTUX vs. HFSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX).
GPTUX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. HFSAX is managed by Advisors Preferred.
Performance
GPTUX vs. HFSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPTUX vs. HFSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | -3.40% | 7.08% | 20.29% | 14.85% | -6.15% | 19.72% | -3.42% | 20.50% | -4.54% | 18.93% |
HFSAX Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class | -0.83% | 11.97% | 3.75% | 10.93% | -9.44% | 9.05% | 38.71% | 10.35% | -1.97% | 9.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTUX achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly lower than HFSAX's -0.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GPTUX having a 8.23% annualized return and HFSAX not far ahead at 8.41%.
GPTUX
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -3.40%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
HFSAX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPTUX vs. HFSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPTUX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSAX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPTUX vs. HFSAX — Risk / Return Rank
GPTUX
HFSAX
GPTUX vs. HFSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPTUX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 2.37 | -1.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 3.18 | -2.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.48 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.78 | -1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | 9.69 | -6.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPTUX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 2.37 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.62 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 1.35 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.30 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTUX and HFSAX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GPTUX vs. HFSAX - Dividend Comparison
GPTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than HFSAX's 9.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | 8.67% | 8.37% | 6.41% | 1.24% | 4.81% | 10.27% | 4.82% | 4.34% | 4.68% | 3.43% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
HFSAX Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class | 9.83% | 9.75% | 5.87% | 5.17% | 4.92% | 10.98% | 13.58% | 6.44% | 3.11% | 11.06% | 5.60% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
GPTUX vs. HFSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTUX drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, which is greater than HFSAX's maximum drawdown of -12.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTUX and HFSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTUX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -12.81% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -3.68% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.31% | -12.81% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.84% | -12.81% | -10.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -3.60% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -2.39% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 1.06% | +1.46% |
Volatility
GPTUX vs. HFSAX - Volatility Comparison
GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX) at 1.72%. This indicates that GPTUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPTUX | HFSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 1.72% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 3.68% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 4.41% | +8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 6.31% | +6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 6.25% | +6.55% |