GPTUX vs. ABRZX
GPTUX (GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund) and ABRZX (Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, GPTUX returned 9.36%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for ABRZX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPTUX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for ABRZX.
Performance
GPTUX vs. ABRZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTUX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than ABRZX's 15.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTUX has outperformed ABRZX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while ABRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.
GPTUX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
ABRZX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 15.69%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 22.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
GPTUX vs. ABRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | 5.75% | 7.08% | 20.29% | 14.85% | -6.15% | 19.72% | -3.42% | 20.50% | -4.54% | 18.93% |
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A | 15.69% | 8.20% | 3.14% | 5.97% | -14.96% | 9.36% | 9.20% | 9.43% | -7.01% | 9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTUX and ABRZX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GPTUX and ABRZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPTUX vs. ABRZX — Risk / Return Rank
GPTUX
ABRZX
GPTUX vs. ABRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPTUX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 5.02 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 16.78 | -9.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPTUX vs. ABRZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTUX drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum ABRZX drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTUX and ABRZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTUX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -26.62% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -4.55% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.31% | -18.28% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.31% | -19.33% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.84% | -26.62% | +3.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -4.55% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -4.74% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.36% | +0.84% |
Volatility
GPTUX vs. ABRZX - Volatility Comparison
GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) at 3.13%. This indicates that GPTUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPTUX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.13% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 8.28% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.99% | 9.39% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 12.26% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 10.93% | +2.00% |
GPTUX vs. ABRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPTUX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than ABRZX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPTUX vs. ABRZX - Dividend Comparison
GPTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than ABRZX's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A | 2.92% | 3.38% | 13.28% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 26.02% | 1.18% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 6.43% | 4.41% | 6.91% |
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | 7.92% | 8.37% | 6.41% | 1.24% | 4.81% | 10.27% | 4.82% | 4.34% | 4.68% | 3.43% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPTUX and ABRZX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPTUX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to ABRZX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTUX dropped -22.84% vs ABRZX's -26.62%.
ABRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPTUX and ABRZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer