PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPROX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPROX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 8.22% return.


GPROX

1D
-0.94%
1M
1.66%
YTD
6.75%
6M
8.90%
1Y
11.17%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
8.87%

GQFPX

1D
-0.68%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.45%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GPROX
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund
6.75%8.87%5.51%14.86%-34.54%3.67%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
8.22%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GPROX and GQFPX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between GPROX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPROX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPROX
GPROX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GPROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPROX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GPROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPROX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPROXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.66

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

2.36

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

3.16

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.10

9.18

-6.07

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPROX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPROX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPROXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.66

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.81

-0.32

Drawdowns

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPROX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPROX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPROXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.86%

-16.95%

-26.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-5.24%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-10.57%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.18%

-4.44%

-7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.98%

-3.00%

-9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.80%

+1.80%

Volatility

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.16%. This indicates that GPROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPROXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.16%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

7.65%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

9.48%

+4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

12.83%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

12.83%

+4.27%

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPROX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPROX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

GPROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.44%, more than GQFPX's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPROX
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund
18.44%19.69%12.03%0.14%0.00%15.32%8.09%2.58%11.25%1.49%0.13%3.75%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.90%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPROX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPROX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to GQFPX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPROX dropped -43.86% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPROX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer