GPRF vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GPRF (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF) and PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GPRF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. GPRF is passively managed, while PYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, GPRF returned 6.57% vs 7.40% for PYLD. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPRF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

GPRF vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.95% return.

GPRF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PYLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 7.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPRF vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	1.33%	6.17%	2.34%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.95%	9.57%	2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GPRF and PYLD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.48

The correlation between GPRF and PYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPRF vs. PYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GPRF	PYLD
Financial Services	20.6%	-
Real Estate	3.4%	-
Utilities	2.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

GPRF vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPRF

GPRF Risk / Return Rank: 49
GPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPRF vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPRF	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.42	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	3.56	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.48	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	2.29	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	10.44	-2.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPRF vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPRF Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPRF and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPRF	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	2.42	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	2.04	-0.67

Drawdowns

GPRF vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, roughly equal to the maximum PYLD drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPRF	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-4.52%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-3.25%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-0.44%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-0.65%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.71%	+0.17%

Volatility

GPRF vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) is 0.78%, while PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that GPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPRF	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	1.24%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	2.50%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	3.08%	+0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.94%	3.99%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.94%	3.99%	-0.05%

GPRF vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPRF vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than PYLD's 6.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	5.65%	5.38%	2.10%	0.00%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.30%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPRF and PYLD in my portfolio?

GPRF and PYLD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPRF or PYLD?

PYLD has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to GPRF (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRF dropped -4.36% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which ETF is better, GPRF or PYLD?

On 1-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.40% vs 6.57% for GPRF. On fees, GPRF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GPRF has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPRF or PYLD?

Over the 1-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPRF or PYLD?

GPRF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPRF or PYLD?

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 5.65% for GPRF.

What is the main difference between GPRF and PYLD?

GPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.55% for PYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.