GPRF vs. EVPF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GPRF (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock funds. GPRF is passively managed, while EVPF is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GPRF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.

Performance

GPRF vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GPRF

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.03%

EVPF

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	$215.17K	$323.39K	$353.47K
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	$179.35K	$1.44M	$844.22K

GPRF vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	-0.22%
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GPRF and EVPF is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026	0.69

Return for Risk

GPRF vs. EVPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPRF

GPRF Risk / Return Rank: 38
GPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
GPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 38

EVPF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPRF vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPRF	EVPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	—	—

Drawdowns

GPRF vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, which is greater than EVPF's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and EVPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPRF	EVPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-2.36%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.49%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-0.45%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GPRF	EVPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	3.77%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.86%	3.77%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.86%	3.77%	+0.09%

GPRF vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPRF vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison

GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than EVPF's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	5.66%	5.38%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPRF and EVPF in my portfolio?

GPRF and EVPF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GPRF or EVPF?

On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPRF or EVPF?

EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GPRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPRF or EVPF?

GPRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 2.09% for EVPF.

What is the main difference between GPRF and EVPF?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.39% for EVPF.