PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPRF vs. CSPF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPRF vs. CSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than CSPF's 3.34% return.


GPRF

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.24%
6M
0.31%
YTD
1.40%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.03%

CSPF

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.17%
6M
1.80%
YTD
3.34%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.34M$1.60M$2.61M
$179.35K$1.44M$844.22K

GPRF vs. CSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPRF and CSPF is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

0.45

The correlation between GPRF and CSPF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPRF vs. CSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPRF
GPRF Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPF
CSPF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPRF vs. CSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPRFCSPFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.30

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

10.23

-5.90

GPRF vs. CSPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPRF Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the CSPF Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPRF and CSPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPRF vs. CSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, which is greater than CSPF's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and CSPF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPRFCSPFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-3.06%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-3.06%

-1.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.64%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-0.44%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.69%

+0.24%

Volatility

GPRF vs. CSPF - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) at 0.87%. This indicates that GPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPRFCSPFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.87%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

3.13%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

4.02%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.86%

4.09%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.86%

4.09%

-0.23%

GPRF vs. CSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPRF vs. CSPF - Dividend Comparison

GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than CSPF's 5.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPRF and CSPF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPRF has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to CSPF (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRF dropped -4.36% vs CSPF's -3.06%.

On 1-year performance, CSPF leads with 7.00% vs 4.03% for GPRF. On fees, GPRF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSPF has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPRF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CSPF.

GPRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 5.33% for CSPF.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.59% for CSPF.

CSPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPRF and CSPF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer