GPN vs. PH
GPN (Global Payments Inc.) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GPN in Specialty Business Services, PH in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, GPN returned -0.28%/yr vs 25.12%/yr for PH. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPN vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than PH's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed PH with an annualized return of -0.28%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.12% annualized return.
GPN
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.89%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- -11.36%
- 5Y*
- -18.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
GPN vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -11.90% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPN and PH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GPN and PH has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GPN:
-$3.90
PH:
$27.11
GPN:
1.39
PH:
5.53
GPN:
$8.83B
PH:
$20.99B
GPN:
$4.25B
PH:
$7.81B
GPN:
$2.27B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPN vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
GPN
PH
GPN vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPN | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 1.90 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 5.64 | -6.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPN vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, roughly equal to the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPN | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -66.92% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.95% | -19.34% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.95% | -26.79% | -27.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.52% | -28.64% | -37.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -54.68% | -15.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.54% | -11.49% | -56.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -15.33% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.92% | 6.52% | +8.40% |
Volatility
GPN vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 13.23% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 7.58%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPN | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.23% | 7.58% | +5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.58% | 18.96% | +11.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.63% | 25.10% | +14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.64% | 28.68% | +7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 31.70% | +2.85% |
Dividends
GPN vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than PH's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.85% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
GPN vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPN vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
GPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
GPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
GPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPN and PH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPN has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to PH (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.17% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPN and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer