PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPN vs. CPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPN vs. CPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Corpay, Inc. (CPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than CPAY's 18.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed CPAY with an annualized return of -0.28%, while CPAY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.


GPN

1D
3.87%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-11.90%
6M
-16.89%
1Y
-12.09%
3Y*
-11.36%
5Y*
-18.15%
10Y*
-0.28%

CPAY

1D
1.50%
1M
7.50%
YTD
18.34%
6M
12.66%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPN vs. CPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-11.90%-30.11%-10.97%29.02%-25.91%-36.91%18.51%77.25%2.92%44.49%
CPAY
Corpay, Inc.
18.34%-11.08%19.75%53.86%-17.94%-17.96%-5.18%54.92%-3.49%35.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GPN and CPAY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010

0.56

The correlation between GPN and CPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

GPN:

-$3.90

CPAY:

$16.74

PS Ratio

GPN:

1.39

CPAY:

5.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPN:

$8.83B

CPAY:

$4.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPN:

$4.25B

CPAY:

$2.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

GPN:

$2.27B

CPAY:

$2.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPN vs. CPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CPAY
CPAY Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPN vs. CPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Corpay, Inc. (CPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPNCPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.04

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

0.07

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.81

0.15

-0.96

GPN vs. CPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the CPAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPN and CPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPN vs. CPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than CPAY's maximum drawdown of -50.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and CPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPNCPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.17%

-50.13%

-20.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.95%

-25.90%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.95%

-34.54%

-19.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.52%

-41.63%

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.17%

-50.13%

-20.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.54%

-8.58%

-58.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-13.33%

-5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.92%

12.35%

+2.57%

Volatility

GPN vs. CPAY - Volatility Comparison

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 13.23% compared to Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) at 9.20%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPNCPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.23%

9.20%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.58%

29.53%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.63%

37.70%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.64%

32.43%

+4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

32.93%

+1.62%

Dividends

GPN vs. CPAY - Dividend Comparison

GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while CPAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPAY
Corpay, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.85%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%

Financials

GPN vs. CPAY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and Corpay, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.97B
1.26B
(GPN) Total Revenue
(CPAY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GPN vs. CPAY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Global Payments Inc. and Corpay, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
GPN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CPAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corpay, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GPN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

CPAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corpay, Inc. reported an operating income of 636.17M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.5%.

GPN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.

CPAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corpay, Inc. reported a net income of 350.07M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPN and CPAY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPN has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to CPAY (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.17% vs CPAY's -50.13%.

CPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPN and CPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer