GPN vs. BBWI
GPN (Global Payments Inc.) and BBWI (Bath & Body Works, Inc.) are both stocks. GPN operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while BBWI operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GPN returned -0.28%/yr vs -6.65%/yr for BBWI. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPN vs. BBWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than BBWI's -1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has outperformed BBWI with an annualized return of -0.28%, while BBWI has yielded a comparatively lower -6.65% annualized return.
GPN
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.89%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- -11.36%
- 5Y*
- -18.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
BBWI
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- -22.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.94%
- 5Y*
- -16.60%
- 10Y*
- -6.65%
GPN vs. BBWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -11.90% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | -1.48% | -46.52% | -8.26% | 4.68% | -38.40% | 133.77% | 107.78% | -25.18% | -54.31% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPN and BBWI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001 | 0.34 |
The correlation between GPN and BBWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPN:
-$3.90
BBWI:
$4.58
GPN:
1.39
BBWI:
0.42
GPN:
$8.83B
BBWI:
$7.25B
GPN:
$4.25B
BBWI:
$3.13B
GPN:
$2.27B
BBWI:
$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPN vs. BBWI — Risk / Return Rank
GPN
BBWI
GPN vs. BBWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPN | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.97 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.41 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | -0.71 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPN vs. BBWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, smaller than the maximum BBWI drawdown of -88.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and BBWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPN | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -88.22% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.95% | -55.00% | +25.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.95% | -69.98% | +16.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.52% | -79.16% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -85.67% | +15.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.54% | -72.24% | +4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -30.35% | +11.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.92% | 31.98% | -17.06% |
Volatility
GPN vs. BBWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) is 13.23%, while Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that GPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPN | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.23% | 18.68% | -5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.58% | 39.03% | -8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.63% | 56.34% | -16.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.64% | 50.65% | -14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 54.62% | -20.07% |
Dividends
GPN vs. BBWI - Dividend Comparison
GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than BBWI's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | 4.12% | 3.98% | 2.06% | 1.85% | 1.90% | 22.61% | 0.81% | 6.62% | 9.35% | 3.99% | 6.68% | 4.17% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.85% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Financials
GPN vs. BBWI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and Bath & Body Works, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPN vs. BBWI - Profitability Comparison
GPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BBWI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a gross profit of 587.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
GPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
BBWI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported an operating income of 231.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.
GPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.
BBWI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a net income of 183.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPN and BBWI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBWI has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to GPN (13.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.17% vs BBWI's -88.22%.
GPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPN and BBWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer