PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPMCX vs. HRIOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Hood River International Opportunity Fund (HRIOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPMCX achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than HRIOX's 45.74% return.


GPMCX

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.56%
YTD
0.71%
6M
3.93%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
-1.89%
10Y*
8.77%

HRIOX

1D
1.09%
1M
9.48%
YTD
45.74%
6M
47.75%
1Y
96.60%
3Y*
41.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GPMCX
Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund
0.71%13.25%3.22%12.46%-31.66%-2.25%
HRIOX
Hood River International Opportunity Fund
45.74%43.32%20.19%30.74%-25.86%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GPMCX and HRIOX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021

0.67

The correlation between GPMCX and HRIOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPMCX vs. HRIOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPMCX
GPMCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GPMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GPMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

HRIOX
HRIOX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
HRIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HRIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Hood River International Opportunity Fund (HRIOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPMCXHRIOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.63

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

7.09

-6.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

28.90

-27.69

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the HRIOX Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPMCX and HRIOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPMCXHRIOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

4.03

-3.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.02

-0.42

Drawdowns

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPMCX drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, which is greater than HRIOX's maximum drawdown of -38.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMCX and HRIOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPMCXHRIOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.27%

-38.76%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-13.78%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-24.76%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

0.00%

-15.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.05%

-12.31%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

3.38%

+1.14%

Volatility

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) is 3.74%, while Hood River International Opportunity Fund (HRIOX) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that GPMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRIOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPMCXHRIOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

8.64%

-4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

19.97%

-8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.77%

24.52%

-10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

21.29%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

21.29%

-6.38%

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPMCX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HRIOX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPMCX vs. HRIOX - Dividend Comparison

GPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than HRIOX's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GPMCX
Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund
3.30%3.33%0.53%0.00%0.00%15.76%8.25%0.69%6.99%7.34%1.20%
HRIOX
Hood River International Opportunity Fund
4.04%5.88%0.16%1.44%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPMCX and HRIOX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRIOX has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to GPMCX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPMCX dropped -44.27% vs HRIOX's -38.76%.

HRIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPMCX and HRIOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer