HRIOX vs. IWM
HRIOX (Hood River International Opportunity Fund) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both funds - HRIOX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Hood River Capital Management, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Over the past 3 years, HRIOX returned 41.09%/yr vs 18.42%/yr for IWM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HRIOX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
HRIOX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRIOX achieves a 44.16% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 18.69% return.
HRIOX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 44.16%
- 6M
- 47.85%
- 1Y
- 95.10%
- 3Y*
- 41.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 43.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
HRIOX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRIOX Hood River International Opportunity Fund | 44.16% | 43.32% | 20.19% | 30.74% | -25.86% | 2.01% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 18.69% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRIOX and IWM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between HRIOX and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRIOX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
HRIOX
IWM
HRIOX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hood River International Opportunity Fund (HRIOX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRIOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.20 | 2.27 | +1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.99 | 3.12 | +1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.37 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.37 | 3.97 | +3.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.10 | 14.12 | +15.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRIOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20 | 2.27 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.37 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
HRIOX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRIOX drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRIOX and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRIOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -59.05% | +20.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -11.03% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -27.50% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.13% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -10.77% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.10% | +0.28% |
Volatility
HRIOX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Hood River International Opportunity Fund (HRIOX) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.56%. This indicates that HRIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRIOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 5.56% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.04% | 13.52% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.56% | 19.14% | +5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 22.52% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 23.04% | -1.74% |
HRIOX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRIOX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
HRIOX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
HRIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than IWM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRIOX Hood River International Opportunity Fund | 4.08% | 5.88% | 0.16% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HRIOX and IWM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRIOX has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to IWM (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRIOX dropped -38.76% vs IWM's -59.05%.
HRIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HRIOX and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer