GPMCX vs. FSTSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX).
GPMCX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Oct 19, 2015. FSTSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 3, 2009.
Performance
GPMCX vs. FSTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPMCX vs. FSTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | -11.91% | 13.25% | 3.22% | 12.46% | -31.66% | 17.27% | 53.02% | 23.79% | -17.74% | 31.50% |
FSTSX Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund | -4.92% | 27.49% | 4.97% | 18.36% | -26.25% | 18.29% | 19.61% | 28.24% | -13.19% | 34.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPMCX achieves a -11.91% return, which is significantly lower than FSTSX's -4.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GPMCX has underperformed FSTSX with an annualized return of 7.66%, while FSTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.
GPMCX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -11.40%
- YTD
- -11.91%
- 6M
- -12.19%
- 1Y
- 0.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
FSTSX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -11.22%
- YTD
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPMCX vs. FSTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPMCX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPMCX vs. FSTSX — Risk / Return Rank
GPMCX
FSTSX
GPMCX vs. FSTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPMCX | FSTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 1.05 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | 1.48 | -1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.21 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 1.30 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 4.56 | -4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPMCX | FSTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 1.05 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.33 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPMCX and FSTSX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPMCX vs. FSTSX - Dividend Comparison
GPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than FSTSX's 16.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | 3.78% | 3.33% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.76% | 8.25% | 0.69% | 6.99% | 7.34% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
FSTSX Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund | 16.03% | 15.24% | 10.22% | 3.34% | 6.38% | 13.22% | 0.81% | 4.27% | 10.99% | 6.30% | 4.01% | 7.32% |
Drawdowns
GPMCX vs. FSTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPMCX drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, which is greater than FSTSX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMCX and FSTSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPMCX | FSTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.27% | -38.91% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -11.22% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.27% | -38.91% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.27% | -38.91% | -5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -11.22% | -15.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -7.95% | -7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 3.19% | +1.05% |
Volatility
GPMCX vs. FSTSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) is 5.42%, while Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that GPMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPMCX | FSTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 6.05% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 9.68% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 15.21% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 16.26% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 15.80% | -1.03% |