GPMCX vs. BISAX
GPMCX (Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund) and BISAX (Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GPMCX returned 9.07%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for BISAX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPMCX charges 1.85%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for BISAX.
Performance
GPMCX vs. BISAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPMCX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly higher than BISAX's -2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GPMCX has underperformed BISAX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while BISAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.
GPMCX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
BISAX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -2.34%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- 27.71%
- 5Y*
- 16.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
GPMCX vs. BISAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | -0.39% | 13.25% | 3.22% | 12.46% | -31.66% | 17.27% | 53.02% | 23.79% | -17.74% | 31.50% |
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | -2.34% | 45.50% | 23.18% | 39.03% | -8.68% | 18.39% | 4.62% | 6.80% | -20.13% | 11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPMCX and BISAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between GPMCX and BISAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPMCX vs. BISAX — Risk / Return Rank
GPMCX
BISAX
GPMCX vs. BISAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPMCX | BISAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.85 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 2.24 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPMCX vs. BISAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPMCX drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, smaller than the maximum BISAX drawdown of -47.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMCX and BISAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPMCX | BISAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.27% | -47.30% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -11.63% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.40% | -11.63% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.27% | -31.44% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.27% | -47.30% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.63% | -10.40% | -6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.05% | -8.04% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 4.38% | +0.18% |
Volatility
GPMCX vs. BISAX - Volatility Comparison
Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPMCX | BISAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 3.57% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 10.41% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 12.57% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 13.90% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 14.27% | +0.64% |
GPMCX vs. BISAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPMCX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BISAX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPMCX vs. BISAX - Dividend Comparison
GPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than BISAX's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | 3.30% | 3.23% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 3.88% | 8.33% | 4.00% | 3.44% |
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | 3.34% | 3.33% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.76% | 8.25% | 0.69% | 6.99% | 7.34% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPMCX and BISAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPMCX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to BISAX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPMCX dropped -44.27% vs BISAX's -47.30%.
BISAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPMCX and BISAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer