GPIX vs. SDEM
GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) and SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. GPIX is actively managed, while SDEM is passively managed. Over the past year, GPIX returned 22.76% vs 28.12% for SDEM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPIX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for SDEM.
Performance
GPIX vs. SDEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than SDEM's 11.17% return.
GPIX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDEM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.26%
GPIX vs. SDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.64% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 13.04% |
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 11.17% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIX and SDEM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.46 |
The correlation between GPIX and SDEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GPIX vs. SDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPIX
SDEM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GPIX
SDEM
Financial Services
GPIX
SDEM
Communication Services
GPIX
SDEM
Consumer Cyclical
GPIX
SDEM
Healthcare
GPIX
SDEM
Industrials
GPIX
SDEM
Consumer Defensive
GPIX
SDEM
Energy
GPIX
SDEM
Utilities
GPIX
SDEM
Real Estate
GPIX
SDEM
Basic Materials
GPIX
SDEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPIX vs. SDEM — Risk / Return Rank
GPIX
SDEM
GPIX vs. SDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPIX | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.13 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 10.28 | +4.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPIX vs. SDEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum SDEM drawdown of -47.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and SDEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIX | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -47.38% | +29.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -9.03% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -3.49% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -20.66% | +19.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 2.74% | -1.17% |
Volatility
GPIX vs. SDEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 3.77%, while Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPIX | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 4.90% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 11.48% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 13.91% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 17.47% | -3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 19.22% | -5.36% |
GPIX vs. SDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SDEM's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPIX vs. SDEM - Dividend Comparison
GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than SDEM's 4.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.09% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 4.99% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPIX and SDEM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDEM has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to GPIX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs SDEM's -47.38%.
On 1-year performance, SDEM leads with 28.12% vs 22.76% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDEM has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 22.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.
GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.09%, compared with 4.99% for SDEM.
GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while SDEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.67% for SDEM.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPIX and SDEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer