GPIX vs. QQQH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH).

GPIX and QQQH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GPIX is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 24, 2023. QQQH is managed by Neos. It was launched on Dec 19, 2019.

Performance

GPIX vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GPIX vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF	-3.19%	16.25%	21.77%	13.45%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	-3.47%	14.17%	25.98%	16.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a -3.19% return, which is significantly higher than QQQH's -3.47% return.

GPIX

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: -4.39%
• YTD: -3.19%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: 16.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQH

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: -3.47%
• 6M: -1.45%
• 1Y: 15.06%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.

QQQH

NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF

GPIX

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF

Return for Risk

GPIX vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 68
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 69
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPIX	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.03	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.58	-0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.24	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.69	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.97	7.97	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPIX vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and QQQH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPIX	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	1.03	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.66	+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and QQQH is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GPIX vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, less than QQQH's 9.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF	8.60%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	9.48%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and QQQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPIX	QQQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-31.24%	+13.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-8.87%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.13%	-4.94%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-8.49%	+6.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	1.88%	+0.32%

Volatility

GPIX vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) at 4.48%. This indicates that GPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPIX	QQQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	4.48%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	8.35%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	14.73%	+2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.07%	13.40%	+0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.07%	13.51%	+0.56%