PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.


GPIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.27%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GVIP

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.71%
YTD
16.17%
6M
18.08%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
9.91%16.25%21.77%13.45%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
16.17%25.27%29.82%17.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and GVIP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.87

The correlation between GPIX and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPIX vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPIX
GVIP

Technology

35.5%
38.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
15.8%

Communication Services

11.5%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.0%

Industrials

8.4%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
1.2%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%
8.4%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

GPIX
35.5%
GVIP
38.6%

Financial Services

GPIX
11.6%
GVIP
15.8%

Communication Services

GPIX
11.5%
GVIP
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GPIX
10.1%
GVIP
8.0%

Healthcare

GPIX
8.4%
GVIP
8.0%

Industrials

GPIX
8.4%
GVIP
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

GPIX
4.9%
GVIP
1.2%

Energy

GPIX
3.5%
GVIP

-

Utilities

GPIX
2.4%
GVIP
8.4%

Real Estate

GPIX
2.0%
GVIP

-

Basic Materials

GPIX
1.8%
GVIP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXGVIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.36

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.71

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.77

11.81

+4.96

GPIX vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and GVIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.05

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.82

+0.96

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and GVIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-37.09%

+19.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-13.67%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.33%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-7.59%

+6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

3.14%

-1.61%

Volatility

GPIX vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 2.26%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

5.42%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

14.47%

-6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

18.13%

-7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

21.29%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

21.65%

-7.85%

GPIX vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.00%8.01%7.45%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.29%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and GVIP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs GVIP's -37.09%.

On 1-year performance, GVIP leads with 36.94% vs 25.55% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 36.94% return vs 25.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.

GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.45% for GVIP.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and GVIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer