GPIX vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GPIX returned 25.72% vs 27.18% for DBMF. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPIX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

GPIX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GPIX having a 10.28% return and DBMF slightly higher at 10.48%.

GPIX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.95%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 11.61%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 9.37%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	10.28%	16.25%	21.77%	13.04%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.48%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and DBMF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.30

Return for Risk

GPIX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 82
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPIX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.21	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.91	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.47	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	4.48	-1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.40	16.18	+0.22

GPIX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPIX	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-20.39%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.71%	-6.10%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-1.72%	+1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-6.56%	+5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.68%	-0.11%

Volatility

GPIX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.68%. This indicates that GPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPIX	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	2.68%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.63%	10.00%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	12.37%	-1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.88%	12.55%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.88%	12.41%	+1.47%

GPIX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPIX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than DBMF's 5.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.18%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	7.97%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPIX and DBMF in my portfolio?

GPIX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPIX or DBMF?

GPIX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to DBMF (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which ETF is better, GPIX or DBMF?

On 1-year performance, DBMF leads with 27.18% vs 25.72% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPIX or DBMF?

Over the 1-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 27.18% return vs 25.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPIX or DBMF?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPIX or DBMF?

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 5.18% for DBMF.

What is the main difference between GPIX and DBMF?

GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.85% for DBMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.