GPIGX vs. QQQI
GPIGX (GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both funds - GPIGX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by GuidePath, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, GPIGX returned 18.66% vs 24.88% for QQQI. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPIGX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
GPIGX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with GPIGX at 9.86% and QQQI at 9.86%.
GPIGX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 18.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 24.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIGX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GPIGX GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund | 9.86% | 9.12% | 15.22% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 9.86% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIGX and QQQI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.65 |
The correlation between GPIGX and QQQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPIGX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
GPIGX
QQQI
GPIGX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund (GPIGX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPIGX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 2.60 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 11.10 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPIGX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIGX drawdown since its inception was -27.88%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIGX and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIGX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.88% | -20.00% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -9.61% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -3.32% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -2.20% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 2.25% | -0.48% |
Volatility
GPIGX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund (GPIGX) is 2.78%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that GPIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPIGX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 7.63% | -4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 11.99% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.55% | 14.79% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 17.53% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 17.53% | -3.73% |
GPIGX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPIGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPIGX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
GPIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%, less than QQQI's 14.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIGX GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund | 13.48% | 14.61% | 1.33% | 2.55% | 1.62% | 14.44% | 1.30% | 1.38% | 2.37% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 14.97% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPIGX and QQQI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to GPIGX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIGX dropped -27.88% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
GPIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPIGX and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer