PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPGOX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Fund (GPGOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPGOX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GPGOX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


GPGOX

1D
-1.04%
1M
2.71%
YTD
10.50%
6M
13.17%
1Y
15.14%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
-2.66%
10Y*
8.18%

GLIFX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.56%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPGOX
Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Fund
10.50%8.59%-10.10%16.25%-33.55%21.59%44.61%31.15%-17.95%32.53%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.33%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GPGOX and GLIFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2011

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between GPGOX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPGOX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPGOX
GPGOX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GPGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GPGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Fund (GPGOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPGOXGLIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

1.46

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

1.98

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.74

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.59

5.88

-2.29

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPGOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPGOX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPGOXGLIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.46

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

1.03

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.77

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.84

-0.20

Drawdowns

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPGOX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPGOX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPGOXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-29.65%

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-9.00%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

-10.02%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.46%

-17.15%

-26.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.46%

-29.65%

-13.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.70%

-5.79%

-13.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-3.36%

-9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

2.66%

+1.47%

Volatility

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Fund (GPGOX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPGOXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.53%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

9.30%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

10.72%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

10.99%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

13.33%

+3.71%

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPGOX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPGOX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

GPGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than GLIFX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
6.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
GPGOX
Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Fund
4.59%5.08%1.54%0.43%1.70%19.69%7.51%5.55%11.23%5.50%0.12%8.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPGOX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to GPGOX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPGOX dropped -43.46% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

GLIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPGOX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer