GPC vs. MSA
GPC (Genuine Parts Company) and MSA (MSA Safety Incorporated) are both stocks. GPC operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while MSA operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, GPC returned 5.20%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for MSA. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GPC vs. MSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPC achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than MSA's 19.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GPC has underperformed MSA with an annualized return of 5.20%, while MSA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.82% annualized return.
GPC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- -0.04%
- 3Y*
- -4.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.53%
MSA
- 1D
- 9.13%
- 1M
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 19.50%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $222.96M | $262.69M | $201.67M | |
| $52.68M | $45.55M | $54.48M |
GPC vs. MSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.18% | 8.70% | -13.22% | -18.12% | 26.82% | 43.39% | -2.19% | 14.05% | 4.11% | 2.45% |
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | 19.50% | -2.14% | -0.71% | 18.52% | -3.15% | 2.14% | 19.79% | 36.10% | 23.61% | 13.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPC and MSA is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.33 |
The correlation between GPC and MSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPC:
$17.15B
MSA:
$7.35B
GPC:
$0.24
MSA:
$10.68
GPC:
526.04
MSA:
17.81
GPC:
0.69
MSA:
2.87
GPC:
$25.07B
MSA:
$1.95B
GPC:
$9.08B
MSA:
$925.88M
GPC:
$736.59M
MSA:
$483.61M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPC vs. MSA — Risk / Return Rank
GPC
MSA
GPC vs. MSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPC | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.08 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 0.37 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 0.71 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPC vs. MSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPC drawdown since its inception was -54.89%, smaller than the maximum MSA drawdown of -70.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPC and MSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPC | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.89% | -70.32% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.48% | -22.60% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -34.28% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.70% | -34.28% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.89% | -38.39% | -16.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.17% | -5.77% | -20.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -17.44% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.58% | 11.64% | +6.94% |
Volatility
GPC vs. MSA - Volatility Comparison
Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a higher volatility of 15.75% compared to MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) at 10.41%. This indicates that GPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPC | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.75% | 10.41% | +5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.28% | 19.77% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.65% | 26.09% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 25.16% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.61% | 28.80% | -0.19% |
Dividends
GPC vs. MSA - Dividend Comparison
GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than MSA's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.36% | 3.35% | 3.43% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% |
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.30% | 1.58% | 1.78% | 1.89% | 2.92% |
Financials
GPC vs. MSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genuine Parts Company and MSA Safety Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPC vs. MSA - Profitability Comparison
GPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.47B and revenue of 6.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
MSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 249.29M and revenue of 503.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
GPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of 336.34M and revenue of 6.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
MSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 107.24M and revenue of 503.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
GPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of 227.56M and revenue of 6.54B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
MSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 86.19M and revenue of 503.33M, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPC and MSA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPC has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to MSA (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPC dropped -54.89% vs MSA's -70.32%.
MSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPC and MSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer