GPC vs. GRC
GPC (Genuine Parts Company) and GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) are both stocks. GPC operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, GPC returned 4.83%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for GRC. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPC vs. GRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPC achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 67.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GPC has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of 4.83%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
GPC
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 22.84%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- -6.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
GRC
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- 6M
- 57.77%
- YTD
- 67.38%
- 1Y
- 114.11%
- 3Y*
- 44.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
GPC vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 4.22% | 8.70% | -13.22% | -18.12% | 26.82% | 43.39% | -2.19% | 14.05% | 4.11% | 2.45% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 67.38% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPC and GRC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.37 |
The correlation between GPC and GRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPC:
$17.48B
GRC:
$2.10B
GPC:
$0.43
GRC:
$2.23
GPC:
290.13
GRC:
35.61
GPC:
0.71
GRC:
3.01
GPC:
3.87
GRC:
2.43
GPC:
$24.70B
GRC:
$695.03M
GPC:
$8.93B
GRC:
$210.01M
GPC:
$760.95M
GRC:
$118.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPC vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank
GPC
GRC
GPC vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPC | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.49 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 7.50 | -7.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 22.51 | -22.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPC vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPC drawdown since its inception was -54.89%, smaller than the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPC and GRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPC | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.89% | -67.23% | +12.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.48% | -14.90% | -22.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.21% | -26.87% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.70% | -49.26% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.89% | -49.26% | -5.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.43% | -13.34% | -12.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -17.60% | +7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.21% | 4.97% | +13.24% |
Volatility
GPC vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison
Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) at 13.36%. This indicates that GPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPC | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.99% | 13.36% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.93% | 30.14% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.61% | 36.09% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 31.08% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 34.08% | -5.57% |
Dividends
GPC vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison
GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than GRC's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.33% | 3.35% | 3.43% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
Financials
GPC vs. GRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genuine Parts Company and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPC vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison
GPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 6.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 57.36M and revenue of 176.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
GPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of 286.27M and revenue of 6.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 27.48M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
GPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of 188.54M and revenue of 6.26B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPC and GRC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPC has higher volatility (14.99%) compared to GRC (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPC dropped -54.89% vs GRC's -67.23%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPC and GRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer