PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOVZ vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOVZ vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOVZ achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.


GOVZ

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.73%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-4.35%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
-7.43%
5Y*
-11.53%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOVZ vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
-0.94%-1.81%-16.24%0.90%-41.03%-4.86%-5.61%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GOVZ and YCS is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

-0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOVZ vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOVZ
GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOVZ vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOVZYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.35

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

3.97

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

12.40

-11.76

GOVZ vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOVZ and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOVZYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.92

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

1.12

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

0.33

-0.92

Drawdowns

GOVZ vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOVZ drawdown since its inception was -59.65%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOVZ and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOVZYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.65%

-49.56%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-8.30%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-23.05%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-27.32%

-30.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.47%

0.00%

-56.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.91%

-19.93%

-19.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.21%

2.66%

+3.55%

Volatility

GOVZ vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that GOVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOVZYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

2.75%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

12.32%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.26%

17.27%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

21.10%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

19.01%

+4.34%

GOVZ vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOVZ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOVZ vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

GOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
5.18%5.00%4.68%3.84%3.69%1.76%0.39%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOVZ and YCS have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOVZ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOVZ dropped -59.65% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.54% vs -11.53% for GOVZ. On fees, GOVZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.54% return vs -11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOVZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

GOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

GOVZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GOVZ and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOVZ and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer