PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOVZ vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOVZ vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOVZ achieves a -2.94% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.35% return.


GOVZ

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.89%
6M
-3.56%
YTD
-2.94%
1Y
0.52%
3Y*
-8.07%
5Y*
-13.19%
10Y*

GSG

1D
3.60%
1M
-0.20%
6M
28.24%
YTD
32.35%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOVZ vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
-2.94%-1.81%-16.24%0.90%-41.03%-4.86%-5.61%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
32.35%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%15.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GOVZ and GSG is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

-0.15

The correlation between GOVZ and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOVZ vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOVZ
GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOVZ vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOVZGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.27

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

1.85

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

6.29

-6.21

GOVZ vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOVZ and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOVZ vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOVZ drawdown since its inception was -59.65%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOVZ and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOVZGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.65%

-89.62%

+29.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-18.81%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.23%

-18.81%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-29.12%

-28.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.35%

-60.04%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-63.69%

+23.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

5.51%

+1.16%

Volatility

GOVZ vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) is 4.88%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that GOVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOVZGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

7.35%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

21.50%

-10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

23.48%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

22.80%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

22.00%

+1.23%

GOVZ vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOVZ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOVZ vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

GOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
5.30%5.00%4.68%3.84%3.69%1.76%0.39%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOVZ and GSG have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to GOVZ (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOVZ dropped -59.65% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 13.83% vs -13.19% for GOVZ. On fees, GOVZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 13.83% return vs -13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOVZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

GOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

GOVZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while GSG is Commodities. GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GOVZ and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOVZ and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer