GOVT vs. UGA
GOVT (iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GOVT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Core Bond Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOVT returned 0.87%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for UGA. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. GOVT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
GOVT vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOVT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GOVT has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 0.87%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.
GOVT
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- 0.87%
UGA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- 75.49%
- 6M
- 64.35%
- 1Y
- 80.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
GOVT vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | -0.11% | 3.77% | 2.95% | 4.17% | -13.39% | -1.11% | 7.28% | 7.36% | 0.26% | 2.19% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.49% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOVT and UGA is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012 | -0.17 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GOVT and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.17 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOVT vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
GOVT
UGA
GOVT vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOVT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 5.47 | -4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 13.25 | -9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOVT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.32 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.73 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.39 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.12 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
GOVT vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOVT drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOVT and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOVT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -86.59% | +67.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | -14.88% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.43% | -26.68% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -38.11% | +21.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.07% | -75.89% | +56.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -12.35% | +5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -36.76% | +31.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 6.13% | -5.16% |
Volatility
GOVT vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT) is 1.09%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that GOVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOVT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 11.66% | -10.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.51% | 30.41% | -27.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63% | 35.14% | -31.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.04% | 34.38% | -28.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 37.27% | -32.05% |
GOVT vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOVT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOVT vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
GOVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 3.59% | 3.49% | 3.14% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 0.96% | 2.17% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 1.57% | 1.40% | 1.25% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOVT and UGA have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to GOVT (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOVT dropped -19.07% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.43% vs 0.87% for GOVT. On fees, GOVT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GOVT has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOVT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
GOVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
GOVT is categorized as Government Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. GOVT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Core Bond Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for GOVT and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOVT and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer