GOU vs. QTJL
GOU (GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GOU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
GOU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOU achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 2.56% return.
GOU
- 1D
- 13.42%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 11.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.72M | $2.58M | $2.18M | |
| $200.88K | $354.66K | $247.25K |
GOU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOU GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF | 13.50% | -4.00% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 2.56% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOU and QTJL is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
GOU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTJL
GOU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -33.40% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -4.62% | -21.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -7.74% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
GOU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.73% | 11.72% | +53.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.73% | 20.43% | +44.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.73% | 20.30% | +44.43% |
GOU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GOU.
GOU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GOU and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for GOU and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer