GOU vs. COTG
GOU (GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. GOU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
GOU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOU achieves a 21.48% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 17.32% return.
GOU
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -12.95%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 6M
- 15.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOU GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF | 21.48% | -2.90% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -13.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOU and COTG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | -0.28 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
GOU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -25.69% | -12.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.75% | -23.48% | +2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -8.35% | -2.98% |
Volatility
GOU vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.23% | 40.65% | +18.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.23% | 40.65% | +18.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.23% | 40.65% | +18.58% |
GOU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOU and COTG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GOU.
GOU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GOU and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for GOU and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer