GOU vs. BAR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

GOU (GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GOU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). GOU is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.

Performance

GOU vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOU achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than BAR's -4.80% return.

GOU

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -3.07%
• 6M: 6.56%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -2.46%
• 6M: -8.94%
• YTD: -4.80%
• 1Y: 22.17%
• 3Y*: 28.37%
• 5Y*: 17.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOU vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOU GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF	16.76%	-4.00%
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	-4.80%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GOU and BAR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

GOU vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BAR

BAR Risk / Return Rank: 26
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOU vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOU	BAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.85	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.21	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.22	—

Drawdowns

GOU vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and BAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOU	BAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.44%	-26.15%	-12.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.84%	-23.91%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-6.63%	-6.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOU	BAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.81%	27.59%	+32.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.81%	18.24%	+41.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.81%	16.57%	+43.24%

GOU vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOU vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither GOU nor BAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOU and BAR in my portfolio?

GOU and BAR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GOU or BAR?

On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOU or BAR?

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GOU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOU or BAR?

GOU and BAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GOU and BAR?

GOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GOU and 0.17% for BAR.