GOOY vs. TYLG
GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) and TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. GOOY is actively managed, while TYLG is passively managed. Over the past year, GOOY returned 88.26% vs 48.51% for TYLG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TYLG.
Performance
GOOY vs. TYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly lower than TYLG's 24.03% return.
GOOY
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 88.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYLG
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 12.68%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 48.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOY vs. TYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 13.61% | 53.95% | 12.58% | -3.73% |
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 24.03% | 16.84% | 20.57% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOY and TYLG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between GOOY and TYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOY vs. TYLG — Risk / Return Rank
GOOY
TYLG
GOOY vs. TYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOY | TYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.84 | 3.14 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.10 | 4.01 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.55 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.50 | 4.83 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | 19.36 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOY | TYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84 | 3.14 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
GOOY vs. TYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, roughly equal to the maximum TYLG drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and TYLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOY | TYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -24.01% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.15% | -10.09% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.61% | -0.43% | -8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -2.73% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 2.51% | +1.69% |
Volatility
GOOY vs. TYLG - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) at 4.45%. This indicates that GOOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOY | TYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 4.45% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.19% | 12.70% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.19% | 15.54% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 19.17% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 19.17% | +4.14% |
GOOY vs. TYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOOY vs. TYLG - Dividend Comparison
GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.99%, more than TYLG's 7.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 50.99% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% | 0.00% |
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 7.47% | 7.66% | 7.24% | 11.89% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOY and TYLG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOY has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to TYLG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOY dropped -24.40% vs TYLG's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 88.26% vs 48.51% for TYLG. On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TYLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 88.26% return vs 48.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 50.99%, compared with 7.47% for TYLG.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOY and 0.60% for TYLG.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOY and TYLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer