PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOY vs. LFGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 14.83% return.


GOOY

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
13.92%
6M
14.56%
1Y
81.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LFGY

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
14.83%
6M
6.65%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOY and LFGY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOYLFGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.06

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

0.16

+4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.64

0.34

+18.30

GOOY vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOY Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOY and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and LFGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOYLFGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-35.94%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.15%

-35.94%

+19.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.37%

-12.29%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-14.02%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

16.57%

-12.19%

Volatility

GOOY vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) is 6.21%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that GOOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOYLFGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

14.01%

-7.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

31.82%

-14.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.33%

38.34%

-15.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

42.48%

-19.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.29%

42.48%

-19.19%

GOOY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOY and LFGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GOOY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.78%, less than LFGY's 82.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
49.78%41.50%36.74%7.90%
LFGY
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
82.27%94.90%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOY and LFGY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFGY has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to GOOY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOY dropped -24.40% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 81.48% vs 7.54% for LFGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 81.48% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOY and LFGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.27%, compared with 49.78% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOY and LFGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer