GOOY vs. CCNR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) and CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOY returned 81.48% vs 55.12% for CCNR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CCNR.

Performance

GOOY vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than CCNR's 21.92% return.

GOOY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -7.48%
• YTD: 13.92%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 81.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCNR

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 21.92%
• 6M: 23.45%
• 1Y: 55.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOY vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	13.92%	53.95%	-4.62%
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	21.92%	46.48%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOY and CCNR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	0.26

Return for Risk

GOOY vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOY

GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 93
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 93
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOY vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOOY	CCNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.51	3.05	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.76	3.71	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.51	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.06	7.25	-2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.64	25.70	-7.06

GOOY vs. CCNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOY Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is comparable to the CCNR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOY and CCNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GOOY vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and CCNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOY	CCNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.40%	-20.06%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.15%	-7.85%	-8.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.37%	-5.21%	-3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.27%	-3.58%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	2.21%	+2.17%

Volatility

GOOY vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) is 6.21%, while ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that GOOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOY	CCNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	6.78%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.39%	13.94%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.33%	18.66%	+4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.29%	20.14%	+3.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.29%	20.14%	+3.15%

GOOY vs. CCNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CCNR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOOY vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison

GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.78%, more than CCNR's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	2.86%	3.48%	1.27%	0.00%
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	49.78%	41.50%	36.74%	7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOY and CCNR in my portfolio?

GOOY and CCNR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOOY or CCNR?

CCNR has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to GOOY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOY dropped -24.40% vs CCNR's -20.06%.

Which ETF is better, GOOY or CCNR?

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 81.48% vs 55.12% for CCNR. On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GOOY or CCNR?

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 81.48% return vs 55.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOY or CCNR?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOY or CCNR?

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 49.78%, compared with 2.86% for CCNR.

What is the main difference between GOOY and CCNR?

GOOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CCNR is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOY and 0.39% for CCNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.