GOOX vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 19, 2026

GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOX is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by T-Rex, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. GOOX is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, GOOX returned 269.80% vs 4.14% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. GOOX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

GOOX vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 25.22% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.37% return.

GOOX

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: -10.44%
• YTD: 25.22%
• 6M: 32.39%
• 1Y: 269.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.48%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOX vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	25.22%	152.30%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.37%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOX and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

GOOX vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOX

GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 94
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOX vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOOX	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.69	4.36	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.78	6.72	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	2.13	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.97	7.95	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.68	48.27	-25.58

GOOX vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOX Sharpe Ratio is 4.69, which is comparable to the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOX and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GOOX vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOX	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.46%	-0.52%	-51.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.98%	-0.52%	-38.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.77%	-0.46%	-16.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-0.07%	-16.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.99%	0.09%	+11.90%

Volatility

GOOX vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that GOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOX	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.30%	0.36%	+15.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.87%	0.85%	+40.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.06%	0.95%	+57.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.29%	1.07%	+59.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.29%	1.07%	+59.22%

GOOX vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOOX vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	0.24%	0.30%	16.78%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOX and RBIL in my portfolio?

GOOX and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOOX or RBIL?

GOOX has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, GOOX or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 269.80% vs 4.14% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GOOX or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 269.80% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOX or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOX or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.24% for GOOX.

What is the main difference between GOOX and RBIL?

GOOX is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GOOX and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.69 vs 4.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.