GOOP vs. LQTI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).

GOOP and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GOOP is an actively managed fund by Kurv. It was launched on Oct 30, 2023. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.

Performance

GOOP vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GOOP vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF	-7.56%	56.18%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.44%	6.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOP achieves a -7.56% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.44% return.

GOOP

• 1D: 4.38%
• 1M: -3.40%
• YTD: -7.56%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 68.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOP vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

GOOP

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

Return for Risk

GOOP vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOP

GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 92
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 36
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOP vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOOP	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.74	+1.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.02	+2.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.14	+0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.37	+1.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	4.15	+8.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOOP vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOP and LQTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOOP	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	0.74	+1.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	0.90	+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between GOOP and LQTI is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GOOP vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

GOOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF	13.52%	11.79%	13.73%	2.06%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GOOP vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOP drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOP and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOP	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.49%	-3.41%	-24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.32%	-3.41%	-19.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.24%	-2.03%	-13.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-0.78%	-5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.75%	1.12%	+4.63%

Volatility

GOOP vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 2.66%. This indicates that GOOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOP	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.35%	2.66%	+8.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.01%	3.87%	+16.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.37%	6.23%	+22.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.75%	6.11%	+18.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.75%	6.11%	+18.64%