PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOP vs. AMZP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOP vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOP achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than AMZP's 5.27% return.


GOOP

1D
-0.95%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
12.36%
6M
10.67%
1Y
93.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZP

1D
-2.73%
1M
-8.93%
YTD
5.27%
6M
5.85%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOP vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.36%52.46%27.67%6.17%
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
5.27%9.56%37.42%7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOP and AMZP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

0.57

The correlation between GOOP and AMZP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOP vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOP vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOPAMZPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.34

0.72

+2.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

1.15

+3.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.14

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

0.88

+3.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

2.27

+13.12

GOOP vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOP Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOP and AMZP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOPAMZPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

0.72

+2.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.87

+0.64

Drawdowns

GOOP vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOP drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, roughly equal to the maximum AMZP drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOP and AMZP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOPAMZPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-27.36%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

-23.64%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.90%

-10.17%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-6.02%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

9.17%

-3.05%

Volatility

GOOP vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) at 8.28%. This indicates that GOOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOPAMZPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

8.28%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.59%

22.18%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.30%

29.12%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

26.85%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

26.85%

-0.94%

GOOP vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOP and AMZP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GOOP vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

GOOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.25%, less than AMZP's 19.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
19.53%22.04%15.15%2.45%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.25%11.79%13.73%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOP and AMZP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOP has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to AMZP (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOP dropped -27.49% vs AMZP's -27.36%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 93.82% vs 20.81% for AMZP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZP has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 93.82% return vs 20.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOP and AMZP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.53%, compared with 12.25% for GOOP.

GOOP is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZP is Options Trading.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOP and AMZP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer