PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOGL vs. PWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOGL vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOGL achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOGL has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 25.89%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 40.58% annualized return.


GOOGL

1D
-1.36%
1M
-9.30%
YTD
16.22%
6M
15.96%
1Y
110.03%
3Y*
44.20%
5Y*
24.94%
10Y*
25.89%

PWR

1D
-0.19%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
64.46%
6M
49.89%
1Y
92.19%
3Y*
56.18%
5Y*
49.77%
10Y*
40.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOGL vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
16.22%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
64.46%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOGL and PWR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2004

0.36

The correlation between GOOGL and PWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOOGL:

$4.45T

PWR:

$105.52B

EPS

GOOGL:

$13.11

PWR:

$7.29

PE Ratio

GOOGL:

27.70

PWR:

95.17

PEG Ratio

GOOGL:

1.36

PWR:

4.72

PS Ratio

GOOGL:

10.50

PWR:

3.51

PB Ratio

GOOGL:

9.29

PWR:

11.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOGL:

$422.57B

PWR:

$29.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOGL:

$255.12B

PWR:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOGL:

$174.08B

PWR:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOGL vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOGL vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOGLPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.43

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

7.45

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.79

17.97

+1.82

GOOGL vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOGL Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is higher than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOGL and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOGLPWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78

2.55

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.41

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

1.21

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.35

+0.49

Drawdowns

GOOGL vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOGL drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOGL and PWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGLPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.29%

-97.07%

+31.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-12.45%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-33.89%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.32%

-33.89%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-45.53%

+1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.71%

-11.64%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.02%

-46.86%

+33.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

5.15%

+0.43%

Volatility

GOOGL vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) is 8.68%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 11.16%. This indicates that GOOGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGLPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

11.16%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.90%

29.60%

-8.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.33%

36.37%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.33%

35.62%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.13%

33.70%

-4.57%

Dividends

GOOGL vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.29%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%

Financials

GOOGL vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
109.90B
7.87B
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOOGL vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
62.5%
14.1%
Portfolio components
GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOGL and PWR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWR has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to GOOGL (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOGL dropped -65.29% vs PWR's -97.07%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOGL and PWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer