PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOG vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOG vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOG has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 26.05%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.46% annualized return.


GOOG

1D
-1.20%
1M
-8.98%
YTD
15.25%
6M
15.01%
1Y
107.32%
3Y*
43.67%
5Y*
23.94%
10Y*
26.05%

NEM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-14.84%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
11.71%
1Y
91.07%
3Y*
36.63%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOG vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
15.25%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-0.43%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOG and NEM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2014

0.12

Fundamentals

EPS

GOOG:

$13.11

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

GOOG:

27.54

NEM:

15.62

PEG Ratio

GOOG:

1.35

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

GOOG:

10.44

NEM:

4.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOG:

$422.57B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOG:

$255.12B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOG:

$174.08B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOG vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOG vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOGNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.32

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

3.36

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

8.94

+9.74

GOOG vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOG Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOG and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOGNEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76

1.96

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.27

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.38

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.12

+0.70

Drawdowns

GOOG vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.60%

-81.30%

+36.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.75%

-27.25%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.35%

-36.57%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.60%

-62.40%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

-62.40%

+17.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.44%

-24.65%

+15.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-41.38%

+32.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

10.22%

-4.45%

Volatility

GOOG vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) is 8.43%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 14.19%. This indicates that GOOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

14.19%

-5.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.50%

36.93%

-16.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.74%

46.87%

-18.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.14%

37.83%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.02%

35.59%

-6.57%

Dividends

GOOG vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than NEM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.29%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.03%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

GOOG vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
109.90B
0
(GOOG) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOG and NEM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to GOOG (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs NEM's -81.30%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOG and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer