PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOG vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOG vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 278.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOG has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 25.80%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 56.13% annualized return.


GOOG

1D
-0.76%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
13.43%
6M
11.09%
1Y
112.81%
3Y*
42.00%
5Y*
23.95%
10Y*
25.80%

MU

1D
1.45%
1M
87.28%
YTD
278.41%
6M
361.42%
1Y
958.34%
3Y*
150.98%
5Y*
67.58%
10Y*
56.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOG vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
13.43%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
278.41%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOG and MU is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014

0.43

The correlation between GOOG and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOOG:

$4.35T

MU:

$1.23T

EPS

GOOG:

$13.11

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

GOOG:

27.12

MU:

50.79

PEG Ratio

GOOG:

1.33

MU:

0.19

PS Ratio

GOOG:

10.28

MU:

21.07

PB Ratio

GOOG:

9.09

MU:

16.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOG:

$422.57B

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOG:

$255.12B

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOG:

$174.08B

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOG vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOG vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOGMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.94

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

31.98

-26.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.89

126.47

-106.58

GOOG vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOG Sharpe Ratio is 3.98, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 14.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOG and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOGMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98

14.69

-10.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.30

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

1.13

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.31

+0.50

Drawdowns

GOOG vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.60%

-98.25%

+53.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.75%

-30.28%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.35%

-57.63%

+28.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.60%

-57.63%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

-57.63%

+13.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.87%

0.00%

-10.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-58.20%

+49.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

7.64%

-1.95%

Volatility

GOOG vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) is 8.08%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.51%. This indicates that GOOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

28.51%

-20.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.16%

53.48%

-33.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.59%

66.00%

-37.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.10%

52.31%

-21.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.99%

49.66%

-20.67%

Dividends

GOOG vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

GOOG vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
109.90B
23.86B
(GOOG) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOOG vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alphabet Inc and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
62.5%
74.4%
Portfolio components
GOOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

GOOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

GOOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOG and MU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (28.51%) compared to GOOG (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.69 vs 3.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOG and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer