PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOG vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOG vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 7.90% return.


GOOG

1D
2.50%
1M
-6.61%
YTD
17.14%
6M
18.84%
1Y
109.32%
3Y*
43.99%
5Y*
24.12%
10Y*
26.76%

KMLM

1D
-0.39%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
7.90%
6M
9.07%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
-0.78%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOG vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
17.14%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%-2.57%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
7.90%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOG and KMLM is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOG vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOG vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOGKMLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.20

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

1.79

+3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.58

6.05

+12.52

GOOG vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOG Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOG and KMLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOG vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and KMLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.60%

-27.47%

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.75%

-7.19%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.35%

-22.28%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.60%

-27.47%

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-15.87%

+7.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-12.74%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

2.12%

+3.79%

Volatility

GOOG vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 3.31%. This indicates that GOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

3.31%

+4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.46%

9.74%

+10.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.85%

11.47%

+17.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.18%

14.62%

+16.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.04%

14.70%

+14.34%

Dividends

GOOG vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than KMLM's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.23%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.66%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOG and KMLM have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOG has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to KMLM (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs KMLM's -27.47%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOG and KMLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer