GOLI vs. GLDM
GOLI (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GOLI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. GOLI is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past year, GOLI returned 4.14% vs 22.28% for GLDM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GOLI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
GOLI vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLI achieves a -9.15% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -4.78% return.
GOLI
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -11.75%
- YTD
- -9.15%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 1Y
- 22.28%
- 3Y*
- 28.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- —
GOLI vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -9.15% | 15.16% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -4.78% | 38.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLI and GLDM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GOLI and GLDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLI vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
GOLI
GLDM
GOLI vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLI | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.90 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 2.24 | -1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLI vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLI drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, roughly equal to the maximum GLDM drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLI and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLI | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -26.11% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.88% | -26.11% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.21% | -23.86% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -6.42% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 10.51% | -2.34% |
Volatility
GOLI vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 8.29%. This indicates that GOLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLI | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.11% | 8.29% | +6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.32% | 23.91% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.96% | 27.58% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 18.25% | +4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 17.05% | +6.19% |
GOLI vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLI vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
GOLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.78%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 50.78% | 37.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLI and GLDM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOLI has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to GLDM (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLI dropped -25.88% vs GLDM's -26.11%.
On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 22.28% vs 4.14% for GOLI. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 22.28% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOLI.
GOLI has the higher dividend yield at 50.78%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
GOLI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLDM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOLI and 0.10% for GLDM.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOLI and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer