PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLI vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLI vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLI achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -6.13% return.


GOLI

1D
-0.96%
1M
-0.36%
6M
-12.09%
YTD
-9.80%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.90%

GLDM

1D
-1.46%
1M
-1.72%
6M
-16.53%
YTD
-6.13%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$263.44M$251.25M$317.77M
$229.39K$245.33K$424.44K

GOLI vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GOLI
Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF
-9.80%15.16%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-6.13%38.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLI and GLDM is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.88

The correlation between GOLI and GLDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLI vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOLI
GOLI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GOLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLI Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOLI vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLIGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.17

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

0.88

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

1.90

-1.39

GOLI vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLI Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLI and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLI vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLI drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, roughly equal to the maximum GLDM drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLI and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLIGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-26.27%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.88%

-26.27%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.79%

-24.94%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-6.56%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

12.12%

-2.61%

Volatility

GOLI vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) is 4.89%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that GOLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLIGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

6.35%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

23.37%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.21%

27.92%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

18.39%

+4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.98%

17.10%

+5.88%

GOLI vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLI vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

GOLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.92%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%
GOLI
Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF
49.92%37.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLI and GLDM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to GOLI (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLI dropped -25.88% vs GLDM's -26.27%.

On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 20.58% vs 4.70% for GOLI. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GOLI has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 20.58% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOLI.

GOLI has the higher dividend yield at 49.92%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

GOLI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLDM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOLI and 0.10% for GLDM.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLI and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer