PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLI vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLI vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLI achieves a -9.90% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's -6.02% return.


GOLI

1D
0.90%
1M
-2.54%
6M
-13.72%
YTD
-9.90%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAAU

1D
1.37%
1M
-3.71%
6M
-11.66%
YTD
-6.02%
1Y
21.11%
3Y*
27.33%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLI vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOLI and AAAU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.88

The correlation between GOLI and AAAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLI vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLI
GOLI Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GOLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLI Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLI vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLIAAAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.16

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.81

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.41

1.97

-1.56

GOLI vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLI Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLI and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLI vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLI drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, roughly equal to the maximum AAAU drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLI and AAAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLIAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-26.14%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.88%

-26.14%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.88%

-24.84%

+4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-6.41%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.37%

10.75%

-2.38%

Volatility

GOLI vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 6.97%. This indicates that GOLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLIAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.21%

6.97%

+5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.39%

23.99%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.04%

27.66%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.23%

18.23%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

17.22%

+6.01%

GOLI vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLI vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

GOLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.21%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOLI and AAAU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOLI has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to AAAU (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLI dropped -25.88% vs AAAU's -26.14%.

On 1-year performance, AAAU leads with 21.11% vs 3.39% for GOLI. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AAAU has been the lower-risk option at 6.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 21.11% return vs 3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOLI.

GOLI has the higher dividend yield at 51.21%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.

GOLI is categorized as Derivative Income, while AAAU is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOLI and 0.18% for AAAU.

AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLI and AAAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer