GOLI vs. AAAU
GOLI (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOLI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. GOLI is actively managed, while AAAU is passively managed. Over the past year, GOLI returned 3.39% vs 21.11% for AAAU. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GOLI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.
Performance
GOLI vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLI achieves a -9.90% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's -6.02% return.
GOLI
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -13.72%
- YTD
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAU
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -11.66%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- 21.11%
- 3Y*
- 27.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- —
GOLI vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -9.90% | 15.16% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | -6.02% | 38.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLI and AAAU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GOLI and AAAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLI vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
GOLI
AAAU
GOLI vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLI | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.16 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.81 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 1.97 | -1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLI vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLI drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, roughly equal to the maximum AAAU drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLI and AAAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLI | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -26.14% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.88% | -26.14% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.88% | -24.84% | +4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -6.41% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 10.75% | -2.38% |
Volatility
GOLI vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 6.97%. This indicates that GOLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLI | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 6.97% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.39% | 23.99% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 27.66% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 18.23% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 17.22% | +6.01% |
GOLI vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLI vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
GOLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.21%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 51.21% | 37.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLI and AAAU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOLI has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to AAAU (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLI dropped -25.88% vs AAAU's -26.14%.
On 1-year performance, AAAU leads with 21.11% vs 3.39% for GOLI. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AAAU has been the lower-risk option at 6.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 21.11% return vs 3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOLI.
GOLI has the higher dividend yield at 51.21%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.
GOLI is categorized as Derivative Income, while AAAU is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOLI and 0.18% for AAAU.
AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOLI and AAAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer