PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLF vs. ORCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOLF vs. ORCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 23.65% return, which is significantly higher than ORCL's -4.95% return.


GOLF

1D
-1.29%
1M
14.41%
YTD
23.65%
6M
16.38%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*

ORCL

1D
0.02%
1M
-5.87%
YTD
-4.95%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-13.59%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
18.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLF vs. ORCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
23.65%14.09%13.96%51.02%-18.69%32.71%27.13%57.63%2.09%9.84%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
-4.95%18.13%59.99%30.94%-4.65%36.89%24.25%19.34%-2.97%24.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLF and ORCL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between GOLF and ORCL has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOLF:

$5.89B

ORCL:

$536.74B

EPS

GOLF:

$2.83

ORCL:

$5.86

PE Ratio

GOLF:

34.73

ORCL:

31.41

PEG Ratio

GOLF:

4.83

ORCL:

1.29

PS Ratio

GOLF:

2.27

ORCL:

7.97

PB Ratio

GOLF:

7.14

ORCL:

12.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOLF:

$2.61B

ORCL:

$67.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOLF:

$1.24B

ORCL:

$79.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOLF:

$321.92M

ORCL:

$6.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLF vs. ORCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLF
GOLF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GOLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ORCL
ORCL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ORCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORCL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ORCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLF vs. ORCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLFORCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.04

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

-0.12

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

-0.20

+5.63

GOLF vs. ORCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the ORCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLF and ORCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLF vs. ORCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, smaller than the maximum ORCL drawdown of -84.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and ORCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLFORCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.46%

-84.19%

+48.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-58.25%

+40.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-58.25%

+32.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-58.25%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-43.48%

+39.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-29.11%

+19.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

35.41%

-28.35%

Volatility

GOLF vs. ORCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) is 7.56%, while Oracle Corporation (ORCL) has a volatility of 23.44%. This indicates that GOLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ORCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLFORCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

23.44%

-15.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.00%

43.42%

-22.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.03%

65.91%

-37.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.28%

42.16%

-10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.44%

35.12%

-3.68%

Dividends

GOLF vs. ORCL - Dividend Comparison

GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than ORCL's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
1.25%1.49%1.21%1.23%1.70%1.24%1.53%1.72%2.47%2.28%0.00%0.00%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
1.09%0.97%0.96%1.44%1.57%1.38%1.48%1.72%1.68%1.52%1.56%1.56%

Financials

GOLF vs. ORCL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Oracle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
752.98M
19.18B
(GOLF) Total Revenue
(ORCL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLF and ORCL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ORCL has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to GOLF (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs ORCL's -84.19%.

GOLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLF and ORCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer