PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLF vs. BUD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOLF vs. BUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than BUD's 25.25% return.


GOLF

1D
-0.82%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
10.26%
6M
5.34%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
24.38%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

BUD

1D
-1.91%
1M
8.53%
YTD
25.25%
6M
30.24%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
-2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLF vs. BUD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
10.26%14.09%13.96%51.02%-18.69%32.71%27.13%57.63%2.09%9.84%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
25.25%30.33%-21.37%9.04%0.09%-12.66%-13.97%27.69%-38.79%9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLF and BUD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2016

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOLF:

$5.27B

BUD:

$156.32B

EPS

GOLF:

$2.83

BUD:

$6.15

PE Ratio

GOLF:

31.06

BUD:

12.85

PEG Ratio

GOLF:

4.32

BUD:

1.13

PS Ratio

GOLF:

2.03

BUD:

1.30

PB Ratio

GOLF:

6.38

BUD:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOLF:

$2.61B

BUD:

$120.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOLF:

$1.24B

BUD:

$67.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOLF:

$321.92M

BUD:

$35.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLF vs. BUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLF
GOLF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GOLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BUD
BUD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLF vs. BUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLFBUDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

0.53

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

0.84

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.13

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.68

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.08

1.28

+2.80

GOLF vs. BUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the BUD Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLF and BUD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLFBUDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.53

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.08

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.26

+0.38

Drawdowns

GOLF vs. BUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, smaller than the maximum BUD drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and BUD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLFBUDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.46%

-70.02%

+34.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-20.36%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-31.55%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-42.88%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.79%

-26.41%

+11.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-23.45%

+14.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

10.84%

-3.95%

Volatility

GOLF vs. BUD - Volatility Comparison

Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) at 10.32%. This indicates that GOLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLFBUDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.28%

10.32%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

17.96%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.44%

26.23%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.16%

24.88%

+6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.36%

27.66%

+3.70%

Dividends

GOLF vs. BUD - Dividend Comparison

GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BUD's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
1.70%1.91%1.74%1.28%0.88%0.98%0.79%2.45%5.15%3.63%5.41%3.21%
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
1.38%1.49%1.21%1.23%1.70%1.24%1.53%1.72%2.47%2.28%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GOLF vs. BUD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
752.98M
30.61B
(GOLF) Total Revenue
(BUD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOLF vs. BUD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
47.2%
55.9%
Portfolio components
GOLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 355.26M and revenue of 752.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.

BUD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

GOLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 120.15M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

BUD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

GOLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 81.42M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

BUD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOLF and BUD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOLF has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to BUD (10.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs BUD's -70.02%.

GOLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLF and BUD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer