PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLDX vs. GABGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLDX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than GABGX's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX has underperformed GABGX with an annualized return of 14.52%, while GABGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.


GOLDX

1D
-3.08%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
1.07%
6M
8.57%
1Y
68.25%
3Y*
45.36%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
14.52%

GABGX

1D
0.64%
1M
5.02%
YTD
7.05%
6M
6.02%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
16.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
1.07%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%
GABGX
Gabelli Growth Fund
7.05%18.67%35.38%45.39%-39.04%22.48%39.11%34.19%1.89%29.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLDX and GABGX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLDX vs. GABGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GABGX
GABGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GABGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GABGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLDXGABGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.50

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

2.10

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.42

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.58

4.89

+1.68

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the GABGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLDX and GABGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLDXGABGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.50

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.53

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.75

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.55

-0.32

Drawdowns

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLDX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, which is greater than GABGX's maximum drawdown of -66.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLDX and GABGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDXGABGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.40%

-66.39%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.96%

-16.53%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.96%

-22.39%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.73%

-42.36%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-42.36%

-7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

0.00%

-25.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-16.69%

-17.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.79%

4.79%

+7.00%

Volatility

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) at 3.49%. This indicates that GOLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLDXGABGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.29%

3.49%

+10.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.80%

12.06%

+23.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.68%

15.48%

+27.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.54%

23.44%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.26%

22.51%

+9.75%

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLDX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than GABGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLDX vs. GABGX - Dividend Comparison

GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.41%, more than GABGX's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GABGX
Gabelli Growth Fund
5.12%5.49%6.27%1.66%0.00%5.03%7.02%11.48%5.66%6.28%5.17%8.19%
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
15.41%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLDX and GABGX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOLDX has higher volatility (14.29%) compared to GABGX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLDX dropped -73.40% vs GABGX's -66.39%.

GOLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLDX and GABGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer