PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLD.AS vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLD.AS vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD.AS achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 61.93% return.


GOLD.AS

1D
-1.46%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
2.90%
6M
5.08%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
31.11%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*

ASML

1D
1.23%
1M
24.54%
YTD
61.93%
6M
51.85%
1Y
132.84%
3Y*
34.91%
5Y*
21.59%
10Y*
34.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLD.AS vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GOLD.AS
Amundi Physical Gold ETC C
2.90%64.94%26.36%13.35%-0.13%-4.09%24.31%18.40%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
61.93%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%56.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD.AS and ASML is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.10

The correlation between GOLD.AS and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLD.AS vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLD.AS
GOLD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLD.AS vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLD.ASASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

7.48

-5.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

20.18

-15.40

GOLD.AS vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLD.AS and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLD.ASASMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

3.29

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.52

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.56

+0.55

Drawdowns

GOLD.AS vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD.AS drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD.AS and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLD.ASASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-90.00%

+68.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.83%

-17.85%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.83%

-45.38%

+27.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-56.84%

+35.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.22%

0.00%

-16.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-28.15%

+21.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

6.61%

+0.13%

Volatility

GOLD.AS vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) is 6.67%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that GOLD.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLD.ASASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

14.67%

-8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.08%

32.21%

-10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.04%

40.58%

-15.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

42.03%

-24.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

38.50%

-21.48%

Dividends

GOLD.AS vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

GOLD.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.51%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
GOLD.AS
Amundi Physical Gold ETC C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLD.AS and ASML have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLD.AS and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer