PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOIGX vs. QFVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOIGX achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 21.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GOIGX has underperformed QFVOX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while QFVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


GOIGX

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.68%
6M
2.61%
YTD
9.36%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
6.46%

QFVOX

1D
1.71%
1M
3.79%
6M
13.92%
YTD
21.28%
1Y
39.79%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
10.51%
ALL TIME*
7.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOIGX
John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A
9.36%29.39%10.41%12.55%-27.00%9.33%22.08%27.45%-12.31%36.25%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
21.28%33.85%-0.70%19.88%-17.14%19.44%2.65%17.93%-13.28%25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GOIGX and QFVOX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between GOIGX and QFVOX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOIGX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOIGX
GOIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GOIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GOIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

QFVOX
QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOIGXQFVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.47

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

3.54

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

12.57

-7.53

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOIGX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOIGX drawdown since its inception was -54.60%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOIGX and QFVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOIGXQFVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.60%

-70.51%

+15.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-11.02%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-14.92%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.46%

-32.90%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

-45.52%

+7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.69%

0.00%

-6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.56%

-15.22%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

3.09%

+0.74%

Volatility

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) at 4.42%. This indicates that GOIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOIGXQFVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

4.42%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

13.92%

+4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.55%

15.51%

+5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

15.59%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

16.37%

+0.84%

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOIGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOIGX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

GOIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QFVOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOIGX
John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.48%2.39%13.77%15.05%0.00%0.40%2.58%0.23%0.62%0.14%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
4.66%5.66%1.95%1.88%1.43%10.11%1.58%1.14%0.98%0.60%1.02%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOIGX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOIGX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to QFVOX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOIGX dropped -54.60% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOIGX and QFVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer